Is vllm affected by CVE-2026-34753?

PyPI vllm is affected in >=0.16.0 <0.19.0.

Is CVE-2026-34753 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 0.2%.

medium

CVE-2026-34753

Q: Is CVE-2026-34753 being exploited?

Not on the CISA KEV list. EPSS exploit probability is 0.2%.

PyPI · vllm

Summary

vLLM: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in `download_bytes_from_url `

Severity: medium
EPSS: 0.2% (p15)
Also known as: GHSA-pf3h-qjgv-vcpr
Published: 2026-04-03

References

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-pf3h-qjgv-vcpr
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34753
https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/38482

Related advisories

CVE-2026-48746 — critical · PyPI/vllm
CVE-2026-22778 — critical · PyPI/vllm
CVE-2025-47277 — critical · PyPI/vllm
CVE-2025-32444 — critical · PyPI/vllm
GHSA-ggpf-24jw-3fcw — critical · PyPI/vllm
CVE-2024-9052 — critical · PyPI/vllm
CVE-2024-9053 — critical · PyPI/vllm
CVE-2024-11041 — critical · PyPI/vllm

Is your project exposed to this? Stateward checks every dependency on every pull request and flags it only if your code actually reaches it.

Check my repo

Summarize with AI

ChatGPT Claude Perplexity

Sources: CISA KEV (public domain), OSV.dev & GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY-4.0), FIRST EPSS, NVD/CWE (public domain). Served live from the Stateward advisory database.