Comparaison

Stateward vs Snyk

Snyk pioneered developer-first dependency scanning and is strong, mature tooling for open-source and container risk. Stateward overlaps on SCA and SAST but is built around a different idea: instead of scanning files and manifests in isolation, it builds a knowledge base of your whole codebase and reasons over it, then runs a multi-agent adversarial audit to return a verdict rather than a list.

CapacitéStatewardSnyk
Dependency / SCA scanningYes, with reachabilityYes, a core strength
Whole-codebase knowledge base (call graph, trust boundaries)YesDiff- and file-scoped
Merge-induced & cross-branch flawsYesNo
Multi-agent adversarial deep audit with reproductionsYesNo
AI-generated-code auditing as a first-class targetYesPartial
Inline PR review with one-click fixYesYes
Secret detectionYesYes
Compliance mapping (OWASP, CWE, SOC 2, NIS2, DORA)YesPartial
EU-sovereign hosting (Citadea)Yes, by defaultRegional options
Free for individuals & open sourceYesYes

Positionné au niveau catégorie et volontairement honnête. Snyk est un bon outil — voir ci-dessous où il l’emporte.

Quand Snyk est plus adapté

Snyk is the safer pick if your priority is the broadest possible vulnerability database with years of curation, deep package-manager coverage across many ecosystems, or an established enterprise procurement relationship. It is a proven, large-catalogue SCA platform.

Conçu pour mériter votre confiance

Lecture seule & éphémère

Stateward commente, sans jamais pousser, fusionner ou stocker vos clés.

Hébergement souverain UE

Code et données restent hébergés en UE via Citadea — pensé pour NIS2, DORA et le CRA.

Conscient de tout le code

Raisonne sur le graphe d’appels et les frontières de confiance, pas seulement le diff.

Stateward est en bêta et recrute des partenaires de conception. Conçu par Yggdrasil Digital.