Summary
NLTK: Uncontrolled search path when invoking the Graphviz 'dot' binary
Advisory details
Two NLTK sites executed the Graphviz dot program by bare name, so process creation resolved it via the search path — and on Windows via the current working directory — rather than a validated absolute location. An attacker who can place a file named dot where resolution looks (the CWD on Windows, or a writable/relative entry such as . on PATH) has their binary executed in place of Graphviz (arbitrary code execution).
Affected (<= 3.10.2):
nltk.parse.dependencygraph.dot2img— calledfind_binary("dot")but discarded the returned validated path and then ran the bare name["dot", ...], so the validation had no effect.nltk.translate.api.AlignedSent._repr_svg_— ran the bare name with no validation at all (IPython SVG rendering).
This is the same class already fixed for the senna, weka, boxer, malt, repp and hunpos wrappers. nltk.internals.find_binary refuses a CWD-relative match for a bare tool name and returns only a trusted absolute path; the fix runs that path in both sites.
Attack demonstration
Captured output, not illustrative. A ./dot that writes a PWNED marker, planted in the CWD with . prepended to PATH.
The vulnerable behaviour (old bare-name exec):
Control (OLD behavior) — bare ['dot'] in this dir with '.' on PATH:
bare ['dot'] executed planted binary = True
The patched functions refuse it:
FIXED code, with ./dot planted and '.' on PATH:
dependencygraph.dot2img : Exception "Cannot find the dot binary..." | planted-binary-executed=False safe
AlignedSent._repr_svg_ : Exception "Cannot find the dot binary..." | planted-binary-executed=False safe
And find_binary itself was attacked directly (the fix trusts nothing else):
Attack 1: ./dot in CWD, no dot on PATH -> LookupError (refused) safe
Attack 2: ./dot/dot (dir 'dot' holding 'dot') -> LookupError (refused) safe
Attack 3: '.' on PATH + ./dot -> LookupError (refused) safe
Attack 4: attacker-writable ABSOLUTE dir on PATH -> returned /…/evilbin/dot (absolute)
Attack 4 is out of scope: trusting an absolute directory that is already on PATH is the operating system's own trust model — an attacker who can write to a PATH directory owns the account regardless of NLTK. find_binary defends specifically against the CWD/relative injection that bare-name exec is vulnerable to (attacks 1–3), which is exactly what this fix inherits.
Environment: python 3.13.7. dot is not required to reproduce — the planted binary is the payload.
References
- https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6hwm-xvph-95vm
- https://github.com/nltk/nltk/security/advisories/GHSA-6hwm-xvph-95vm
- https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-78680
- https://github.com/nltk/nltk/commit/1a3cd1764ab3deb084fb66d0ffb4873717659538
- https://github.com/nltk/nltk/releases/tag/v3.10.3
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/nltk-before-arbitrary-code-execution-via-graphviz-dot-binary
Related vulnerabilities
All Supply chain →- HIGHCVE-2026-55522
PraisonAI workflow include bypasses tools.py autoload opt-in and executes included recipe code
- HIGHCVE-2026-54672
electron-updater: Uncontrolled search path elements within `AppImage` built by `app-builder-lib`
- HIGHCVE-2026-11400
AWS-JDBC Wrapper: Privilege Escalation in Aurora PostgreSQL instance
- HIGHPYPI-TORCHTRITON-2022
Between December 25 and December 30, 2022, a dependency confusion attack hit PyTorch-nightly. An attacker uploaded a malicious package named 'torchtriton' to the public PyPI index with a higher version than the legitimate one shipped on PyTorch's own index; because pip prioritized PyPI, the malicious package was installed by default. The payload collected system fingerprint data (IP, hostname, username, working directory), read sensitive files such as /etc/passwd and SSH keys, and exfiltrated them. PyTorch renamed the dependency to 'pytorch-triton' and reserved a dummy PyPI package to prevent recurrence.
- HIGHSC-DEPENDENCY-CONFUSION-BIRSAN-2021
In February 2021 researcher Alex Birsan published the dependency confusion technique, exploiting how package managers (npm, PyPI, RubyGems) resolve a public package over a private one of the same name with a higher version. By publishing packages matching leaked internal package names to public registries, he achieved code execution on internal build systems at more than 35 companies including Apple, Microsoft, PayPal, Shopify, Netflix, Tesla and Uber. The research was authorized and earned over $130,000 in bug bounties, reshaping enterprise understanding of supply-chain namespace risk.
- HIGHGHSA-7q9c-hpx7-9cwm
TypeSpec: Unauthenticated Remote Shutdown of Spector Mock Server via POST /.admin/stop